<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Necessary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordsihate.org/archives/18/necessary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordsihate.org/archives/18/necessary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://wordsihate.org/archives/18/necessary/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsihate.org/?p=18#comment-760</guid>
		<description>I feel like a found a kindred spirit.  I can never spell it right the first time no matter what.  Just a enough time goes but between uses that I always get it wrong. It is so damn frustrating to have to go check the spelling online and and then copy and paste it into my emails.  I have never got it right in my life.  I HATE that word and I want it dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like a found a kindred spirit.  I can never spell it right the first time no matter what.  Just a enough time goes but between uses that I always get it wrong. It is so damn frustrating to have to go check the spelling online and and then copy and paste it into my emails.  I have never got it right in my life.  I HATE that word and I want it dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zero History &#124; Shitty Books</title>
		<link>http://wordsihate.org/archives/18/necessary/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Zero History &#124; Shitty Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 06:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsihate.org/?p=18#comment-717</guid>
		<description>[...] an obstacle course to read, I can safely estimate that at least 200 pages of this shitty book are unnecessary filler, which means you skimped on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an obstacle course to read, I can safely estimate that at least 200 pages of this shitty book are unnecessary filler, which means you skimped on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://wordsihate.org/archives/18/necessary/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsihate.org/?p=18#comment-660</guid>
		<description>If you want this one, then you&#039;re going to have to give up your its/it&#039;s dyslexia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want this one, then you&#8217;re going to have to give up your its/it&#8217;s dyslexia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Words I Love - Vag</title>
		<link>http://wordsihate.org/archives/18/necessary/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Words I Love - Vag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsihate.org/?p=18#comment-350</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Vag&#8221; is a slightly derogatory term for the vagina, used as slang. But the reason I love it so much is because it is typically used by women to refer to their own parts as crudely as possible. Just like &#8220;vagina&#8221; it is completely lacking in sexual undertones, but unlike &#8220;vagina&#8221; it is not sterile and medical. It is bizarre and filthy. One does not have sex with a vag, or examine a vag, one crams objects in a vag. A vag is not clean and ladylike, it is filthy and oozing with stinking putrid fluids. And that is why I love this word. It deliberately calls attention to the negative aspects of vaginas, sort of how the word &#8220;junk&#8221; makes light of a man&#8217;s parts, which on first examination are completely unnecessary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Vag&#8221; is a slightly derogatory term for the vagina, used as slang. But the reason I love it so much is because it is typically used by women to refer to their own parts as crudely as possible. Just like &#8220;vagina&#8221; it is completely lacking in sexual undertones, but unlike &#8220;vagina&#8221; it is not sterile and medical. It is bizarre and filthy. One does not have sex with a vag, or examine a vag, one crams objects in a vag. A vag is not clean and ladylike, it is filthy and oozing with stinking putrid fluids. And that is why I love this word. It deliberately calls attention to the negative aspects of vaginas, sort of how the word &#8220;junk&#8221; makes light of a man&#8217;s parts, which on first examination are completely unnecessary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

